On this evening's (December 1, 2005) edition of Fox News' Hannity
and Colmes, Alan Colmes misleadingly suggested that many or all of
Iraq's weapons of mass destruction were "destroyed by Bill Clinton."
COLMES: ... And Bill Clinton and his pinpoint bombing in the
Iraqi facilities in 1998 destroyed many of those weapons that
President Bush and Cheney said were there.
GEN. TOMMY FRANKS (guest): I also want to point out, there was
little doubt in David Kay's mind that Saddam Hussein possessed
weapons of mass destruction. I think we all know that he had
used weapons of mass destruction on his own people.
COLMES: But they were destroyed by Bill Clinton.
Although Colmes did initially say "many" of Iraq's WMD were
destroyed, his response to Gen. Franks clearly implied that Clinton's
1998 strikes eliminated Saddam's WMD. Unfortunately, Colmes
echoes a common misleading talking point. The whole truth? David Kay has
stated that he believes that the 1998 Desert Fox strikes simply
played a contributing role in dismantling
Saddam's chemical weapons. ("Information found to date
suggests that Iraq's large-scale capability to develop, produce, and
fill new CW munitions was reduced -- if not entirely destroyed -- during
Operations Desert Storm and Desert Fox, 13 years of UN sanctions and UN
inspections." [link
to Kay text]) Biological weapons and nuclear
weapons are an entirely different matter. Kay mentions no such
destruction of these weapons as the result of Desert Fox. (In fact, "We
have discovered dozens of WMD-related program activities and significant
amounts of equipment that Iraq concealed from the United Nations during
the inspections that began in late 2002.")
By the way, here is what Bill Tierney, an UNSCOM inspector in
Iraq from 1996-1998, said in
a recent, eye-opening interview in FrontPageMag about Operation
Desert Fox (emphasis mine):
"Operation Desert Fox was a perfect example of the uselessness
of strike operations. Iraqis have told me that the WMD
destruction and movement started just after Operation Desert Fox,
since after all, who would be so stupid as to start a bombing
campaign and just stop.
"... It was only after Saddam realized that President Clinton lacked
the nerve for anything more than a temper-tantrum demonstration that
he knew the doors were wide open for him to continue his weapons
program. We didn’t break his will, we didn’t destroy his weapons
making capability (The Iraqis simply moved most of the precision
machinery out prior to the strikes, then rebuilt the buildings), but
we did kill some Iraqi bystanders, just so President Clinton could
say 'something must be done, so I did something'."