In a study that should
surprise absolutely no one, the
Center for Media and
Public Affairs (CPMA), an outfit operated by the respected
Drs.
Robert and Linda Lichter, found that television network coverage of
the first 100 days of President Bush's second term was overwhelmingly
negative.
A couple of findings
(emphases added):
"67 percent of President Bush's evaluations were
negative during the first 100 days of his second
term, an improvement over the 71 percent negative
evaluations he received four years ago, but
worse than Bill Clinton's 59 percent negative total
in his first 100 days in 1993.
"ABC was the most critical of President Bush during the
100 days studied - 78 percent of comments aired on
ABC's "World News Tonight" were negative - while
NBC was more balanced, with only 57 percent negative
evaluations. The tone of CBS's coverage was
closer to ABC's - with 71 percent negative comments."*
As an example of some of
the egregious bias that some reporters display, the CPMA highlighted
this little tidbit from John Roberts of CBS, as heard on March 31, 2005.
"Without comment about how he felt taking the nation to
war on such flawed assumptions, President Bush agreed it's
time to go to work."
Says
a summary of the study, "These findings come from CPMA's ongoing
study of presidential coverage on ABC, CBS, and NBC evening news shows.
The latest results are based on the 250 stories the networks devoted to
covering the first 100 days of President Bush's second term, from
January 20th through April 29th. Coders analyzed all on-air comments by
reporters and their sources - excluding representatives of the two
parties - that evaluated the president's policies, political skills
personal traits."
TheMediaReport.com says ... We already
knew this, but it's nice to see a reputable study to confirm it.
* The summary actually says, "The tone of CBS's
coverage was closer to NBC's - with 71 percent negative
comments." This appears to be a typo, as 71 is closer to the 78 percent
for ABC; not closer to the 57 percent for NBC. Here is a
Washington Times article about the study.