A defender of abortion falsely claims in
a
letter in today's Los Angeles Times (Sat. 11/10/07), "The Bible does
mention abortion." The erroneous reader adds that a passage in the
Bible,
Numbers 5, gives a "a detailed formula designed to end a pregnancy."
In fact, the cited passage makes no mention of pregnancy,
abortion, or miscarriage whatsoever. The reader's assertions are simply
false.
Does the dishonesty at the Los Angeles Times regarding the abortion
issue know no bounds? Does anyone at the Times own a Bible? Are there
fact checkers at the paper?
Indeed, Numbers 5 is an unusual passage. It deals with an Old
Testament practice if a woman is suspected of adultery. The passage
underscores the seriousness of the sin of adultery. It has
nothing to do with abortion. Through a kind of ritual involving cereal
and "bitter water," a priest calls on God for Him to reveal whether or
not a woman has been unfaithful to her husband. Yet the passage says
nothing about the woman being pregnant, and it does not say that the
prescribed bitter water would "cause her to miscarry," as the reader
falsely states. To assert otherwise is simply dishonest or ignorant. (If
you need more on this, check out
this article from Randy Alcorn as well as
this article from ChristianAnswers.net.)
We have shown that propagating abortion falsehoods is a regular
practice at the Times. We've reported on it
here, here,
here,
here,
here, here, and
here.
+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+
The readers' letters were in response to a
book excerpt published last week in the Times from author
Garry Wills.
We dealt with the crooked Wills in
this post a few weeks ago.
In critique of Wills, the Times posted
a "Blowback" item on its web site. It's by
Gregory Popcak
of the
Pastoral Solutions Institute. It is an excellent critique, but, lo
and behold, the Times has not yet published it in its print
edition. Why not?
In addition,
Steve Wagner at
the
Stand to Reason blog has posted a great takedown of Wills' excerpt.
Check it out.
Finally, as a reminder, Wills is one of these guys who calls himself
"Catholic" but reveals himself to be anything but that. I addressed this
in my post a few weeks ago. I won't pile on any further, but there was
a comment left by reader Brendan at the Stand to Reason blog that I
can concur with:
As a Catholic I must note that Gary Wills has been and continues
to be an embarrassment to the Catholic faith and Christianity in
general. He is a wolf in sheep's clothing, a man who claims the
faith as his own while simultaneously watering it down with
heresies, falsehoods, and relativistic nonsense that does nothing
but injure the mission of the Church on earth and the salvation of
souls. He is in need of our prayers.
Amen, brother.