See you in court for defamation! (l to r) David Clohessy, SNAP; Matt Jatczak, SNAP Detroit;
Jameson Cook, the Macomb Daily; and Niraj Warikoo, the Detroit Free Press.
[First reported at TheMediaReport.com]
A falsely accused priest in Michigan has sued the group SNAP, SNAP's disgraced former director David Clohessy, the Detroit Free Press newspaper, and the Macomb Daily newspaper, claiming that they wrongly charged that he molested a 16-year-old girl in the 1970s.
Rev. Kenneth Kaucheck filed a lawsuit for defamation and libel in Wayne County Circuit Court in Michigan, on January 30, and now TheMediaReport.com is the first to report the news. This is already the second lawsuit that SNAP has faced so far in 2017.
[**Click to read Fr. Kaucheck's lawsuit against SNAP and the press (pdf)**]
Seeking truth and justice
Fighting the good fight:
Rev. Kenneth Kaucheck
According to the lawsuit, Kaucheck was placed on administrative leave after the allegation, but neither a civil, criminal, or canonical hearing has ever been held for Kaucheck to present his case and fight the false claim.
Yet the mere decades-old accusation – made by a woman who enjoys complete anonymity – did not halt SNAP and the media from hurling false statements about the priest.
According to the lawsuit, among the many false claims that were aired was that the Archdiocese of Detroit "determined that in 1976 he committed sexual misconduct with a 16-year-old girl." In truth, even though Kaucheck has delivered to the Archdiocese of Detroit sworn affidavits and other evidence to support his innocence, no such determination has ever been made about his case, and there has never been any kind of hearing allowing him to prove his innocence.
Fr. Kaucheck was also accused of "working with pregnant teens" at a shelter (Gianna House) "without the knowledge or approval of the Archdiocese." In fact, according to the lawsuit, Rev. Kaucheck has never had any contact with any girls at the facility, his role at Gianna House is strictly one for fundraising, and the archdiocese was very well aware of Kaucheck's work for the shelter since its inception.
In 2015, Kaucheck voluntarily submitted himself to a psychological evaluation by an expert in priest sex abuse. The doctor concluded that Fr. Kaucheck's history, psychological profile, and spiritual life are "not consistent with those who sexually abuse adolescent females" and that "Fr. Kaucheck is and always has been a psychologically healthy priest and he is not a threat to adolescent females or to women."
Not letting the facts get in the way
Yet the inconvenient truths about Fr. Kaucheck's case did not stop SNAP's hysterical former director, David Clohessy, from doing his usual smear job. On April 17, 2016, Clohessy and SNAP published a press release trumpeting that Kaucheck was "ousted because he molested a girl" and that the Archdiocese of Detroit should alert every parish in the archdiocese so it will be "harder for [Fr. Kaucheck] to assault another girl."
Surprisingly, SNAP has removed the offending post from its web site (see a screenshot). We are unaware of any other time in SNAP's history that the group has removed a press release from its site, no matter how incorrect or crazy. This sure appears to be an admission of guilt by Clohessy and SNAP.
As for the Detroit Free Press and the Macomb Daily newspapers, in the summer of 2016, a lawyer for Fr. Kaucheck sent letters to the papers which asked for retractions from the papers and provided evidence to support the requests. (The letters are attached to the lawsuit.)
What were the papers' response to the lawyer's requests? Both papers completely ignored them. And while both papers have gleefully regurgitated the false charges about Fr. Kaucheck over the years, neither paper has ever informed the public that Fr. Kaucheck requested a retraction and has now sued them. So much for transparency.
Kudos to Fr. Kaucheck for standing up to the crazy bullies at SNAP and in the media and for fighting for truth and justice.
Developing …
See also:
• "SNAP's Clohessy Resigns In Wake of Lawsuit Scandal That SNAP Took Lawyer Kickbacks and Exploited Victims" (1/25/17)
• "SNAP’s Leadership Suddenly Resigns Amid Lawsuits and Scandals" (2/7/17)
And the same for the 19th at 1251AM where readers are welcome to consider ‘Dan’s pearly-clutching self-exculpations as they may.
He was so ‘frustrated’ – doncha see? – because nobody could see through the “lies”. Alternative possibility: they all saw through the lies that ‘Dan’ has constructed about himself to evade the realities of his own issues. That – alas – is also what a nice, tight, fixed delusional system will get you.
And as to 17th at 1253PM: ‘Dan’ will try once again with the now-familiar I’m Not/You Are myah-myah bit, this time in regard to my point about clinical projection.
But since he apparently doesn’t actually understand the dynamics of clinical projection, he hastily moves on.
And on to what?
To Mission Dolores, which ‘Dan’ claims to have visited some 30 years ago.
Continuing with my comment on ‘Dan’s of the 17th at 1253PM:
He is apparently trying to cash in on the Irish cemetery matter, by claiming that he saw “the backyard” that was “full of infants buried at young ages” (can infants be buried at old ages?). The cemetery (or cemeteries, if you factor in all of the many phases of its existence) resulting from the several centuries of the Mission’s varied life (it was founded near the end of the 18th century) have been several times moved by municipal development during the periods of both Mexican and American government control.
It is not credible that ‘Dan’ came across a cemetery that was full of infant remains; the Mission at various times actually comprised entire farming and cattle-raising communities with all their residents and thus those cemeteries were the repository of deceased of all ages.
Why would ‘Dan’ even try a gambit like this? First, to cash in – as I said – on the current Irish cemetery matter; and second – stunningly – as a way to work in the old anti-Catholic saw about secret cemeteries behind convents wherein the bodies of the nuns’ illegitimate children were buried.
Continuing with my comment on ‘Dan’s of the 17th at 1253PM:
But wait – it gets better, or rather more repellent:
‘Dan’ was informed – he claims – by “the nun in charge” that – get this – “these infants were part of the Irish Potato Famine”. But – in a question that reveals the abyssal depths of ‘Dan’s stupidity as well as mendacity – neither the nun nor ‘Dan’ – according to his story here – has an answer as to why “these infants” “weren’t buried in Ireland”.
The Mission began its existence more than three-quarters of a century (five days before the American Declaration of Independence was signed, actually) before the Irish Potato Famine. The Irish driven to American shores by that Famine wound up mostly in city enclaves along the Eastern seaboard or a relatively short distance inland from the coast. Few if any would have made the then-laborious and dangerous trek or voyage to the West coast.
The remains interred in any part of a Mission Dolores cemetery would not have been Famine Irish, let alone there being a cemetery “full” of unknown Irish babies and infants. They weren’t “buried in Ireland” because they were in California in the mid-19th century and they weren’t Irish to begin-with and would have been mostly Hispanic or Native American, with perhaps whatever smattering of folks who came out for the Gold Rush of 1849 might have wound up buried there.
So much for this self-declared “servant of Truth”. Abyssally stupid or whacko – readers may judge as they will; but unreliable and mendacious either way.
Now you're going to blame me for the lies of a catholic nun. Guess that's no different than how you blame me for all the rest of your cult's lies, including yours and Jimmy Mini-pee. Looking forward to Judgment Day, and watching a stupid whacko try to lie his way past God. Maybe the way you're going, you'll just take the direct route to the Lake of Fire.
On then to ‘Dan’s of the 17th at 120PM where – in an irony rendered sublime by his lack of awareness and self-awareness – presumes to lecture the readership about “False Teachers”.
Which – as usual – he presumes with no explication to be “describing in detail your catholic hierarchy and its destructive heresies”. It could far more easily and credibly be taken to describe ‘Dan’ and his stuff.
‘Dan’s “work” – to repeat – is to a) evade his own abyssal infelicities by b) projecting them onto Catholics and religion generally and thus c) creating a cottage-industry for himself (or Himself) on the basis of the fixed delusional system he has built to further that purpose.
Could there be anyone more delusional, than a deceitfully, blatant liar.
On then to ‘Dan’s of the 17th at 219PM where he tries to preemptively neutralize any objections. But clearly – as we have just seen above – it’s much too late for that.
One would have to presume that a) anyone who disagrees with ‘Dan’s stuff is fomenting “false teachings” and that b) such persons are “enemies of Christ” and that c) such persons are also – marvelously, in light of all of the above – “enemies of basically anything truthful”.
That’s where a nice, tight, fixed delusional system will take you.
Same answer as March 21 @ 12:37am
Did not pay too much attention to this post the other day, but noticed your second paragraph, was one of your better assessments. Seeing that my teachings are in line with His Biblical truths and prophetic messages, one would have to rationally realize, and not presume, that your ABC's analysis is right on the money. Kudos to you, publyin'. Maybe you should try taking off your veil, and maybe, just maybe, you shall not perish. 2 Cor 4:3 servant
On the 19th at 401PM JR will once again try to move us to his ‘preferred narrative’ by presuming what we have seen a) not only to have been not-demonstrated on this site, but also what seems b) to be not the case.
Not the case if we are to presume that the Church is and has always been rife with predatory pedophile priests.
And if JR here is now trying to walk-back the Stampede scare-vision to something along the lines of “real Catholics” (nicely capitalized for a change, the alert reader will notice) simply want to “protect their real children” (do people have imaginary children?) and so forth … well, that’s nothing but a truism.
Continuing with my comment on JR’s of the 19th at 401PM:
Nobody could deny that any parent would want to protect his/her children from such abuse.
The question remains: just how much actual abuse was actually perpetrated? And that, but of course, is precisely the point and question that the Abuseniks and the ‘Dan’-voices want to evade, instead moving everybody quickly beyond that question into the deep, dark downlands of their own preferred scare/fever-visions.
Thus while JR may position himself as being one with concerned parents, there remains the vast further scope of his allegations, assertions, claims, accusations, and pronouncements … where I wouldn’t say he is one with most Catholics at all.
So what? I had 12 years of Catholic schools.
I just returned from Ireland where the only people you see at church are mostly over 60. You've lost the young and you'll never get them back. You drove them away with your nonsense. It's so wonderful to see young people without the burden of Catholicism. Educated and free. Wonderful! Religion is a trick. They start you with Santa and leave you with the Lord. Useless. And only viable for the tricked when fear of hell is used as the whip. What a horrific joke.
On then to JR’s of the 19th at 422PM:
Here he biddy-biddy-booms with ‘Dan’ about “dirty money” … and who would know more – and firsthand – about such a topic than JR?
That then pretexts a riff on Catholics being the ones responsible by donating money to the Church.
Responsible for what? Why – of course – for the preferred narrative of scare/fever-visions that is JR’s (and ‘Dan’s) stock in trade.
And if you question those scare/fever-visions that are their stock in trade, why then you ‘excusing’ it all (i.e. all the scare/fever-vision stuff that we still aren’t sure happened to such depth and extent as those visions would claim and insist and presume).
And – but of course, of course – the whole bit concludes with JR clutching the pearls and seeking the golden status of ‘victim’: both he and (with a generous tactical nod) ‘Dan’ are being ‘insulted’ because their stuff is questioned and the stuff doesn’t do well under questioning at all.
On then to JR’s of the 19th at 449PM:
Once again the chatty just-entre-nous bit. This time – as so often – to once again weasel in the idea that nobody has any proof that the Abuseniks here are “lying”. Readers familiar with this site can consult the record as to – surely – JR’s own challenged veracity in so many things, not excluding his own story.
And once again the crocodile tears under the Wig of Exasperated Integrity: couldn’t all these people here “behave differently” by aiming “a bit towards respect and impartiality in all this”.
Had JR and ‘Dan’ been indulged on that score, would we have seen the revelations that have over time been achieved here? Because “respect and impartiality” are precisely what neither JR nor ‘Dan’ demonstrate.
The Game plan was: they’ll hold readers to convenient strictures of ‘charity’ and “respect and impartiality” while they themselves tossed up their scare/fever-visions with reckless vitriol and abandon, insisting that if we didn’t believe it all then we were merely ‘re-victimizing’ (JR) or ‘mocking God’ (‘Dan’).
And, but of course, on the basis of being thus ‘re-victimized’ or ‘mocked’, they could then hold themselves blameless for demonstrating the levels of vitriol, mendacity, manipulation and outright whackness that we have seen and continue to see from them.
Continuing with my comment on JR’s of the 19th at 449PM:
He then lectures us on “real people” – and readers may go and get as much popcorn as they think they will need for the performance.
In the face of the stuff that has been thrown in our faces here for so long “real people” may well decide that it’s all a plop-tossing game; and that readers’ decency is being presumed-upon in order to make piñatas out of them.
But readers also have intelligence and that’s how all this stuff is revealed for what it really is.
To imagine that even if she had hit a berg, Titanic is surely too advanced to be in real trouble was a legitimate stance in the first few minutes. But to insist on that possibility after she had begun to settle and list, and the engines stopped and the lights went out, would be the height of un-wisdom.
Continuing with my comment on JR’s of the 19th at 449PM:
But JR is bleating about maybe we could all “agree to disagree” … a cheap fallback position. And a pose.
As is demonstrated in his effort to bring it all home: JR dons the Wig of Conceptual Integrity to declare that he hath “seen no evidence” … neither have we, and the burden is on the accuser making the allegations.
And on top of that he then perches the Wig of Exasperated Truthiness to declaim and declare and pronounce that it is all so very very “unnatural” and – had you been waitttingggggggg forrrrrrrrr ittttttttttt? – “excruciatingly un-Christian”. Both JR and ‘Dan’ seem really put out that they are not Pope. But carry on as such regardless.
What would happen – d’ye think – if they both were put at an equal distance from the Papal throne. Who would win? JR might win because he would handcuff himself to it; ‘Dan’ however might provide a more Scripturally-laden justification for his own candidacy. More popcorn, please. Much more.
Why would Jim or myself want to rule over a cult of cowardly, lying, idol-worshipping, pedophile and perverted creeps. I'd definitely be running in a totally opposite direction.
And last, but definitely least, little Jimmy Mini-pee says, "I'm not buying the liar label". First off the liar label is not up for sale. It is a free gift from God, who sees through all liars, and I'm freely extending that gift, on my behalf, to the bunch of you hypocrites. I brought my "show", as you creeps like to rudely put it, to several denominations. Just seems lying catholics enjoy falsely accusing me, in order to cause me trouble.
Sad thing that you will never understand, is that you can lie, slander and insinuate all you want, proves absolutely nothing, because I know the truth, and am able to dwell in an indescribable peace within, knowing my Father who knows all things, is laughing at all you lying fools and can't wait for your day of destruction. D-Day for liars.
You claim I'm "not one to turn the other cheek". Someone gets in your face and threatens you with curses, and another man would have punched him in the face. I went back weeks later, with a sign truthfully describing several creepy liars, who were priests, corrupt cops and thugs from your cult, and I'm "not one to turn the other cheek?" CATHOLIC CHURCH, LIAR$, HYPOCRITE$, PEDOPHILE$, PARASITE$. Explain to me one word that doesn't fittingly describe your cult and hierarchy, you and publyin' included, and I'll change my sign. Maybe I should change my READ THE BIBLE, TRUST GOD, NOT CHURCHES and add PHONY or FALSE after NOT, to that sign.
And you are right. I am not a poor victim. I am blessed, and the lies, persecutions and evil accusations of you lying creeps and your fellow lying cult members, have added to my rich blessings. All of you should be very proud of that. Maybe God can turn up the heat in hell for all of you, and I'll be glad to put in a good word for you. servant of a Just God
Girl, you are obsessed with clutched pearls. Why, you mention them so often I'm beginning to think you're projecting.
Jim, If I wanted any of their dirty money, I'd have several opportunities to go after the cult and it's lying creeps for cases of both slander and libel, They can keep it all, as far as I'm concerned, and take it with all their material possessions, down to burning hell with them. As far as you or other victims of child abuse are concerned, I say there isn't enough money in the world, to rightfully compensate for all the horrible physical and mental trauma, victims had to suffer.
Whether you're in agreement or not, I too am a true victim of this cult's lies and travesties. Have you ever spent an overnight stay in prison for 6-8 hours, standing because of my arthritis, among 2-4 drunks, pissing and getting sick on themselves. Did that 5 times, because of false accusations. Spent seven days for contempt of court, because a judge wanted me to admit to screaming obscenities at children, and I refused to admit to what was untrue. Did six psyche ward, hospital stays for 1-5 days. Have you ever lost your freedom, and had to stay in a hospital among the mentally ill, drugged out of their minds, with staff that is under the impression that everyone there is truly whacked and would prefer to treat you as such. Eat the pig slop for the amount of days I stayed in these places, when I'm used to eating some of the best home-cooked fresh meals. In jail with my arthritis, sleeping 7 days on a steel bunk with no more than a 1/4 inch of padding, before bottoming out on metal when I laid on it. All of these stays based on lies, knowing I was innocent of their accusations.
You still don't think I have any right to defend myself, when I sometimes for days protested and defended the very crimes that you and other sexually abused victims suffered, and at times was incarcerated, through false accusations for doing that work. Really Jim? I know the cult enjoys lying against the innocent, in order to take the focus off of their own disgusting sins. They've painted you with the same brush, making you the poster child of a lying victim, only interested in taking from the cult's honestly deserved treasure. They are lying creeps, extraodinaire, and justice for their victims, as far as I'm concerned, would be to see their cult destroyed and implode upon itself, no longer able to lay a finger on another innocent child, all in the name of the One True catholic church. Hypocrites, liars, anti-Christ, anti-Christian, Satan worshippers. Those so-called "scare/fever visions", as publiar likes to accuse me of, quotes from the Word, some thousands of years ago, will definitely come to pass, whether they think so or not. They are perfect descriptions of a false apostate church, describing the whore sitting on the beast, down to the smallest detail, the colors, material greed and sexual perversions and pedophilia, along with it's ultimate destruction. Rev chapter 17-18 The church hierarchy are the ultimate "Wolves in Sheeps Clothing". Real, and no myth. Believe it!!
On then to ‘Dan’s of the 20th at 740PM:
Here – and once again, marvelously, no doubt unwittingly – ‘Dan’ reveals his scam: the “liar label”, which ‘Dan’ ladles onto the world with such reckless and vitriolic abandon, is i) “a free gift from God” and ii) ‘Dan’ is “extending that gift, on my behalf”. Thus ‘Dan’ is tarring so many as “liars” because it is God’s gift which ‘Dan’ is deploying on Dan’s own behalf.
‘Dan’, God, Dan’s behalf, God’s behalf … whatevvvverrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr. The concepts and words get a tad mixed up here, but as I have said, concepts and words mean nothing to these types. If it seems to work for their plop-tossy agendas, then they’ll toss it up. And yet the scream on about how it’s everybody else who’s (fill in the blank) lying, mendacious, insulting, evil, un-Christian, manipulative, deceitful … and on and on.
Thus – again, marvelously – having just exposed his scam and his “show” without realizing it, ‘Dan’ then heads for the Victim-y high-ground by claiming that ‘Jimmy Mitchell’ is ‘rude’ for noticing it.
I'm screaming on because you deceivers have closed your ears and refuse to listen to the words describing you lying creeps perfectly; Your hierarchy, publyin', Jimmy Mini-peewee and any of your cult's many liars – cowards, lying, insulting, insinuating, evil, un-Christian, manipulative, deceitful and let's not forget, unbelievers, mockers, idolators, anti-Christ, Satan worshippers, pagan thugs, hypocrites, parasites and your 'speshull' favorites, pedophiles and perverts. May I say guilty of just about every disgusting, disingenuous, horrible sin possible against the Lord Almighty. These are not lies or slander, but absolute truth, otherwise I would be as guilty as you compulsive liars. Repent and change, or suffer the consequences. Don't whimper and cry, while adding more reason for the Almighty God to rightfully destroy you. You've been warned, my conscience is clear. I will not respond to the rest of your garbage and ignorance, but will include you with Jimmy, your Mini-pee. servant
Continuing with my comment on ‘Dan’s of the 20th at 740PM:
And that first paragraph then concludes with yet another finely put demonstration of ‘Dan’s nice, tight, fixed delusional system: “lying catholics enjoy falsely accusing me, in order to cause [him] trouble”.
I doubt very much that the muck ‘Dan’ peddles here got any better reception in any other “several denominations”, unless ‘Dan’ went to some of the whackier little bunches that pock the landscape out in California. No, he’s got it in for Catholics; probably because they were the first to notice just how off-the-rails he was to begin with.
But we see once again the ridiculous presumption that such types as ‘Dan’ have to make (and have to try to make everyone else make) in order to keep their own self-serving and self-preserving delusionary cartoons going: “hundreds” of people, and police, and judges are really just spending a lot of time and effort merely to … “cause [‘Dan’] trouble”.
Once you’ve committed to that whackery, then the rest follows with increasing whackness as merely ‘the next logical step’: thus those Catholics are liars, and those Catholics represent all Catholics, and thus the Church is made up of liars, and on and on. The Stampede has been like catnip to these types.
Continuing with my comment on ‘Dan’s of the 20th at 740PM:
Thus then the pearly-clutchy snark as ‘Dan’ sheds crocodile tears that poor us “will never understand that you can lie”. Actually, what has ‘Dan’ riled up now is that it is becoming clear not only how much he can, but how much he does, lie.
And then – with yet more marvelous self-ignorance – ‘Dan’ doth declaim and pronounce that he doth “know the truth” … “because I know the truth”, as he puts it with witless insouciance.
And once you’ve gone over that bridge, then it collapses behind you and you are stuck on an ever-deeper journey into fixed-delusional-system-land.
Demonstrated immediately by ‘Dan’s next bit of whackery: he doth dwell – doncha see? – “in an indescribable peace within” (because he doth “know the truth” and he and God are pretty much either on the same page or consist of the same paper).
And can anyone read ‘Dan’s material in the record here and seriously imagine that they are seeing the fruit of the interior life of one who doth “dwell in an indescribable peace within”? The material is ranting vitriolic violent and threatening – and not particularly intelligent either. That’s what a nice, tight, fixed delusional system will get you.
And – pitch-perfectly – this self-proclaimed paragon of peacefulness ends the paragraph with a cocktail of epithet and threat.
Continuing with my comment on ‘Dan’s of the 20th at 740PM:
Then the next paragraph just tries to again make the case that ‘Dan’ only does what he does because he was ‘threatened’ “with curses” … leaving unstated just why somebody (or a bunch of somebodies) out of a clear blue sky would suddenly start threatening and cursing … presuming, of course, that the threat-and-curse story is veracious to begin-with. And on and on.
There is little use trying to ‘explain’ anything to ‘Dan’, even when he has purposely donned the Wig Of Honest Inquiry, because that Wig is perched on a head that is long and far gone into a fixed delusional system that requires a fundamental and almost total commitment to self-serving and self-preserving deceit and untruth in order to keep itself going.
That’s what I would say the clinicians saw during the 5150 holds, and ‘Dan’ remains at liberty (presuming he is truthful in that claim) merely because he hasn’t done enough (yet, anyway) to justify the requirements of state law and the expenditure of that state’s increasingly scarce resources in committing him.
On March 19, 2017 at 12:51 am Dan claims he never threatened or physically harmed anyone and that there was no legal basis to put him on a 5150 hold. I’m sure Dan’s intention was not to threaten or physically harm anyone but the delivery of his performance at the Church concerned enough people to believe that Dan just might harm someone hence his 5150. Dan tried in vain to point out to the arresting police officers that he was not a danger to himself or others. I wonder how many stories an arresting police officer has heard in his lifetime that the person they have apprehended “didn’t do it”. It was also unfortunate for Dan that one of the “lying” Catholics just so happened to be an off-duty police officer. Oops, on a few occasions. How many occasions would that be? This officer who witnessed Dan’s charade didn’t see things the way Dan did either. Once again, not to put too fine a point on it, on a few occasions. It should come as no surprise that the officers on duty took the word of the “Catholic” cop instead of Dan’s and, more than once. For Dan not to see an issue here is quite telling. A rational individual would have learned their lesson the first time they ran into legal issues. I can see the individual making the same mistake twice but when you get to the third, fourth, fifth and sixth time, then it’s obvious that we are not dealing with a rational individual.
Dan, ever the victim, wishes that I can someday walk in the shoes of the victims of my church, the ones I refuse to believe. And who might that be? Dan? What’s not to believe about Dan’s story other than his glossed over recollection of why he was arrested six times. He ends by trying to manipulate himself into the sexual abuse scandal and ends with a question and plea that I show, at least, some compassion and understanding. I guess if you don’t buy Dan’s story then you are not compassionate and understanding. If it’s compassion and understanding that he desires, then I might suggest he tell a believable story.
I wasn't asking, nor do I expect compassion or understanding from you or publiar. I was asking that you might show that respect to the sexually abused victims of your cult. You two think nothing your opponents say is "believable", obviously witnessed by how you feel you must dispute almost every sentence or idea, whether you're right or wrong. "Deceiving others, while being themselves deceived". servant of an Honest God
On March 20, 2017 at 7:40 pm reveals more of the truth. Give Dan time. Dan has brought his show to several denominations and it was only the Catholic’s who falsely accused him. Dan’s own witness and testimony on this website displays a Dan who is not so nice to Catholics. If Dan received some push back from his performance, he surely is to blame for that. If a Jehovah Witness comes to your door and you ask them to leave and not come back, they do so and will leave you alone. Ask Dan to leave and not come back? You just brought the reign of God upon you and Dan will deliver His fury. But, Dan will need time to think and consult God before retruning weeks later. Could this have been after one of his many stays behind bars or possibly after one of his 5150’s? Time will tell. Dan can’t help himself and will go after you if you don’t like what he has to say and how he says it. No worries though, Dan will whisper in God’s ear to let Him know who should go to hell. Who is Dan serving?
You ask, "Who is Dan serving?" A just, loving, kind and forgiving God, who is also a vengeful, wrathful, punishing and powerful God. Your own actions, be as they may, will determine which one you'll stand before, come Judgment Day. The only one who may "whisper in God's ear", will be Jesus Christ, hopefully he can become your only mediator by then.
There’s not much to deal with in the current crop, or much that isn’t – in a way no doubt unintended – self-revelatory.
But ‘Dan’s of the 21st at 1235AM is of some interest: caught in his Mission Dolores baloney, ‘Dan’ now claims that he is being victimized and ‘blamed’ “for the lies of a Catholic nun”.
So here’s Dan’s bit (neither the bit nor its sub-bits should be presumed veracious, but let’s assume he is telling the truth): he went to the Mission / he saw a graveyard full of remains / a “nun in charge” told him that they were Potato Famine babies / but neither she nor ‘Dan’ can explain why they weren’t (taken back to be) “buried in Ireland”.
Readers so inclined may accept that there would be a “nun in charge” so uninformed as to say that they were Potato Famine babies.
But then ‘Dan’ says that she perpetrated “lies” upon him … and … that sounds familiar: ‘Dan’ seems to continually run into strangers who for no reason whatsoever “lie” to him or about him and then that explains why he always gets stuck with the ‘blame’(and it’s a lengthy record of such ‘blame’).
He cawn’t think why anyone could imagine there could be any other explanations except “lies”.
At this point I don’t consider ‘Dan’s whackness to be in question; but I think it worthwhile to point out the habitual and pervasive mendacity that must of necessity accompany such a fixed delusional system.
This accusation is absolutely ridiculous, publyin'. The nun told me something that was false. I don't know if she personally knew different and lied, or she just didn't know the truth of how the children got there. Either way, I didn't get upset with her at all and just walked away. I never used the word, "perpetrated" lies. For you to write a page of nonsense and once more connect it to my imaginary problem of FDS, is ignorance and stupidity. How 'bout getting yourself a life and find something constructive to do with your wasted time. Maybe you can start a cartoon liars show and hit it rich, before your Judgment Day. servant
As per Dan March 21, 2017 at 2:29 am as if on cue, give Dan time and he will reveal more of the truth, Dan claims he could have sued the Church for libel and slander but didn’t want their dirty money. Really? This coming from someone who has friends in high places like a former district attorney and a Judge. No, if Dan had a case he would have taken the doe. But scanning further down we see why Dan doesn’t have a case. Amongst Dan’s six incarcerations and four detentions for mental issues, he has now spent seven days in jail for contempt of court. I’m guessing the Judge is a Catholic creep? Dan reveals that the judge insisted that Dan admits he was screaming obscenities at the children in the school yard. When Dan refuses to admit to something he claims “he didn’t do” we are to believe the judge threw him in jail for that. Could there be an alternative reason as to why a judge, on top of the hundreds of witnesses including priests, nuns, police officers and teachers, saw something about Dan that deserved a stay behind bars. I’m guessing there was something that happened in the court room that was on par with Dan’s performance at the Catholic school and the Catholic church. Cue Jeopardy music.
Dan, I'm just guessing here but I think P's trying to cast aspersions on our masculinity.
Not a scam, show, performance, cartoon or fantasy, Stampede, Abuseniks, or any other cute names, you two can dream up to support your deceiving agenda. I will let the Lord's Word do the speaking, I'm so tired of responding to either of you deceptive creeps.
"He that is unjust, let him be unjust still: and he which is filthy, let him be filthy still: and he that is righteous, let him be righteous still: and he that is holy, let him be holy still." Rev 22:11
Now I lay no claim to righteousness or holiness, and responding to you two has admittedly brought out some of my worst, yet I do believe that I have every God given right to defend myself against lies and liars. However the first half of this verse defines you and your wicked cult to a tee.
unjust def. – characterized by injustice, dishonest, unfair or not morally right http://www.yourdictionary.com/unjust - just happened to use the word in a sentence: If an innocent man is found guilty because the police lied, this is an example of an unjust verdict. Just happened to describe some of what transpired against me, based on your cult of liars.
filthy def. – foul, disgustingly or completely dirty, vile; obscene, contemptibly offensive. Couldn't better describe the pedophiles and perverts of your cult, and I'll leave it to God to decide how he feels about the bishops, popes, RAT-zingers, publiars and his Mini-liars, who think it's their responsibility to make excuses, defend and enable the creeps to carry on with their disgusting nastiness. servant of the Lord of Justice and Truth
P.S. publiar – Where did you acquire such a knowledge of a fixed delusional system. Was that as a slimy-troll, under the porch, peeking up the dresses of your committed, pedophile priests?
"Instead, we have renounced secret and shameful ways. We do not practice deceit, nor do we distort the word of God. On the contrary, by open proclamation of the truth, we commend ourselves to every man's conscience in the sight of God. And even if our gospel is veiled, it is veiled to those who are perishing. The god of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers so they cannot see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God. For we do not proclaim ourselves, but Jesus Christ as Lord, and ourselves as your servants for Jesus' sake." 2 Corinthians 4:2-5
No secret or shameful ways, deceit, dishonesty or lies, nor do we distort, manipulate or change the word of God. servants of the Lord our God
I’ll go down the list of the most recent as they appear on the site.
Thus to ‘Dan’s of the 21st at 229AM:
With all this brouhaha about how ‘Dan’ has been lied about and slandered and so on, yet he won’t resort to legal action (as ‘Jimmy Mitchell’ points out). And why not? Why rant on about it when you can sue?
As for the very unpleasant jail stays, I point out again that the primary point is whether he was ‘unjustly jailed’ or simply ‘jailed’ – readers can consider the answer to that point as they may.
Did he find it distinctly unpleasant? Perhaps he shouldn’t do things that land him in jail (especially since he also has “arthritis”). But that would require living alone with his issues (and perhaps dealing with them) and he’s developed a different plan: project outward, blame others, and construct the fixed delusional system that will ‘justify’ it all.
And then he lets another goodie out of the bag: he was jailed for contempt and it had something to do with the accusation by witnesses that he was “screaming obscenities at children”. Which accusations seemed probable to the court, which also would have had access to ‘Dan’s record and also to ‘Dan’ on the hoof as an actual physical presence, which – as I have said – is probably even more scary than ‘Dan’ on the internet.
Believe I stated before, that I was not interested in your cult's filthy, dirty money. I'm not a coward, tattle-tale or out to seek my own revenge. I'm leaving that up to my Creator, so He can take full vengeance and wrath, for the lies, slander and false accusations, cast upon me from the whole bunch of you compulsive liars. In this way you'll all have something to look forward to. I wouldn't want you to be disappointed, come Judgment Day. servant
Isn't it just ironic, how the lying accusations against myself are probable, and yet you think you can convince everyone, that the true accusations against the pedophiles, perverts and creep excusers like yourself, must be analyzed and questioned, before you come to the wrong conclusion that they must be false. And this is why my labeling you all lying, disingenuous, disgusting creeps, is nothing short of deserving and truth. Deal with it! servant
Continuing with my comment on ‘Dan’s of the 21st at 229AM:
‘Dan’ – naturally, in light of the demands of his fixed delusional system – just ‘knows’ he “was innocent of their accusations”. He may believe that or he may not, but there’s no way that any third-party (such as the readership here) has any way of “knowing” he was “innocent”.
Thus to there’s no way any third-party (such as the readership here) can legitimately accept ‘Dan’s assurance that it’s only all about his “right to defend [himself]”.
And we see again how the inherent mendacity required by his system confuses him: he here now claims that he “defended the very crimes” that he usually clams to be against.
And then more Scripture, again trying to hornswoggle Scripture into supporting the necessary mendacities of his fixed delusional system.
And it all ends in a threat and epithet, claiming – as usual = that it is all “real, and no myth” and you’d all better “Believe it!”. In other words, believe not Scripture necessarily at all, but rather ‘Dan’s use of it for his own system’s purposes.
Thus to ‘Dan’s of the 21st at 1058PM:
Once again, we merely get a riff that requires that one presumes ‘Dan’s presumptions as to what are “words describing you lying creeps perfectly”.
As to what describes ‘Dan’ perfectly – or at least pretty substantially – well, it’s either the rabbit-hole of his preferred narrative and his fixed delusional system or else it’s the fact that he’s pretty much gone around the bend because he hasn’t got the courage to face up to himself and his issues.
He’s “screaming” because he has to make us believe in his fixed delusional system too, in order to a) get back at the people that have already realized what he is and to b) keep making noise so as to drown out what’s inside.
All this would be his personal soap-opera or struggle, except that the solution he has devised requires projecting his issues outward and impugning the targets (Catholics, largely) that he has selected for that projection.
And at this point his prayers will include that “God destroy” those who don’t buy his stuff. A real soul of sweetness and light dwelling in an indescribable inner peace … indeed.
On then to ‘Dan’s of the 22nd at 115AM:
Once again – as we have also seen with JR – ‘Dan’ will try here to reduce his many allegations and stories and claims from the conceptual to the personal, referring to “compassion and understanding”. Those two traits are – according to the Playbook of both Victimism and of ‘Dan’s fixed delusional system (from here on: FDS) – designed to sidestep the abyssal problems with their material and instead designed to manipulatively play upon readers’ or listeners’ sense of charity and decency.
There’s something of the sociopathic in all of this (to use a term JR likes to toss at doubters and questioners): the strategized distracting appeal to emotion designed to overcome the many conceptual problems with the material and the questions those problems quite naturally prompt.
And it’s not a matter of whether one does or does not choose to “think” that the material is “believable”. It is a matter of whether the material, when rationally considered, does or does not demand doubt and further questions simply because of that material’s inherent non-credible elements.
And – as so often – ‘Dan’ huffs and puffs against others in regard to a warning that he might best apply to himself: “Deceiving others, while being themselves deceived”.
On then to ‘Dan’s of the 22nd at 1237AM:
Here ‘Dan’ demonstrates that he has stitched together two strands of Scripture in just the way necessary to further the purposes of his FDS: God is “just, loving, kind and forgiving” (that’s the front’ that ‘Dan’ likes to present to the world) and God is also “vengeful, wrathful, punishing and powerful” (that’s the real ‘Dan’, except for the “powerful” part, but no doubt he likes to think of himself that way). ‘Dan’ surely reveals himself here as being indeed a “wolf in sheep’s clothing”.
And it all ends with a threat.
Then on the 21st at 816PM JR will try to change the subject to something less conceptual and more in the plop-tossy line that is his natural level of operation: I am “trying to cast aspersions on our masculinity”. JR’s “masculinity” is what it is, existing on a spectrum somewhere between pearl-clutching and a shotgun.
JR might want to be concerned less about his “masculinity” and more about his maturity.
On then to ‘Dan’s of the 21st at 1151PM:
‘Dan’ still hasn’t realized – nor can allow himself to, if the requirements of his FDS are to be met – that the problem here isn’t with either God or Scripture but rather with ‘Dan’s manipulative use of God and Scripture.
His pericope in the second paragraph slyly requires that one accept ‘Dan’s presumption and preferred narrative as to just who is “filthy” and who is “righteous”. And it’s that presumption (and not the pericope itself) that is the problem here.
Continuing with my comment on ‘Dan’s of the 21st at 1151PM:
Then a pose in the third paragraph: he doth “lay no claim to righteousness” … and yet he recently bethumped the police in a comment here precisely because they were supposed to recognize and distinguish between the “righteous” and the “unrighteous” and clearly ‘Dan’ cast himself in the role of the righteous in that scenario. The ball of ‘truth’ keeps bouncing like a football in ‘Dan’s stuff.
Nor do I think – this old bit again – that it is only because of the irritation of “responding to you two” that ‘Dan’ has revealed “some of [his] worst” here. ‘Dan’s “worst” is the actual ‘Dan’ – for which all the pious, sweetness-and-light Christian and Scriptural posing is simply the sheep’s-clothing.
The dictionary definitions here are thus irrelevant to the main point at issue.
Continuing with my comment on ‘Dan’s of the 21st at 1151PM:
‘Dan’ here will try again with his myah-myah I’m Not/You Are bit: this time, in regard to how I come to know so much about FDS’s. The idea of getting an education and learning about such things apparently hasn’t occurred to him.
Instead, he dreams up the concluding epithetical bit that makes no sense whatsoever, but is nicely revealing about ‘Dan’s mentation nonetheless.
On then to ‘Dan’s of the 22nd at 850AM:
But it’s just another pericope, once again shoehorned into the service of ‘Dan’s FDS, i.e. that ‘Dan’ doesn’t i) practice “deceit, dishonesty or lies” nor does he ii) “distort, manipulate or change the word of God”.
I’d say that it’s pretty clear that ‘Dan’ does all of (a) and that in regard to (b) he mis-applies the word of God for his own purposes and the requirements of his FDS.
It's apparent that you forgot your Bible study, I suggested, perfectly describing your cult, so I'll gladly assist you by pointing out the highlights to get you started, and we'll see who mis-applies the word of God. – 2 Peter 2
"False teachers will also sneak in and speak harmful LIES to you. But these teachers don't really belong to the Master who paid a great price for them, and they will quickly destroy themselves. Many people [1.1 billion?] will follow their evil ways and cause others to tell LIES about the TRUE WAY. They will be GREEDY and cheat you with smooth talk. But long ago God decided to punish them, and God doesn't sleep. God punished the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah by burning them to ashes, and this is a warning to anyone who wants to sin. The Lord is especially hard on people who disobey Him and don't think of anything except their own FILTHY desires. [Couldn't better describe your cult of compulsive pedophiles and perverts, their excusers and enablers.] They are reckless and proud and are not afraid of cursing the glorious beings in heaven. They speak evil of things they don't know anything about. [These 2 previous sentences couldn't better describe publiar, Know-Nothing, proud mocker of truth.] But their own corrupt deeds will destroy them. They have done evil, and they will be rewarded with evil. There is no end to their wicked deeds. They trick people who are easily fooled, and their minds are filled with greedy thoughts. They brag out loud about their stupid nonsense. When they learned about our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, they escaped from the FILTHY things of this world. But they are caught up and controlled by these FILTHY things, and now they are in worse shape than they were at first. They would have been better off if they had never known about the right way. Even after they knew what was right, they turned their backs on the holy commandments that they were given."
"A dog will come back to lick up it's own vomit. A pig that has been washed will return to roll in the mud."
Don't allow deceivers, who couldn't care about breaking any commandment of God, LIE in order to achieve their wicked goals and agenda. Worshipping idols instead of God, compulsive liars, thieves of men's souls, more fithy than adulterers, pedophiles and perverts, having no problem disobeying the Almighty God, in order to protect their Immoral Cult of Hypocrites. Truly "Wolves in sheeps clothing". Don't be foolish enough to believe the lyin' fools.
You may as well be talking to yourself, with your repetitive lies against me. And I don't think your cute little abreviation, FDS, will work, because they've already been applied to you and jimmy Mini-peewee. False Deceptive Sinners or Fake Deceitful Snakes. You pick one and your clone, Jimmy Mini-peewee will want that one and you can take the other label. I also notice you've been leaning on your "I'm Not/You Are" bit an awful lot, lately. Is your material becoming weak, or are your lies and cowardice, just becoming stronger? servant
You creeps may want to save your slew of compulsive lies, because I think it's time we do one of your indepth studies and lying assessments in regards to Fr. Inzoli (AKA "Don Mercedes"), just one of the numerous guilty creeps of your cult. I'll laugh while you think you can lie your way out of that rabbit hole, Alice. Quit playing stupid and ignorant. It's not a good look for you. I'll be waiting for your nonsense and garbage. And don't forget, when you're cornered, you can always fall back on the insistent, repetitive lies you've put on me.
Actually, the Scripture and verse is a perfect fit for you, slips right on with no "shoehorn" needed, so if the shoe fits you should just wear it. No exchanges, returns, or trying to put the shoe on the other foot, with your consistent "I'm Not/You Are" bits. I call it imitation Lyin', Mock-in suede, fake and fraudulent in every aspect, and fits you perfectly. servant
Per Dan on March 22, 2017 at 1:15 am he would like to deflect the issues I have seen with his material and try to play on emotions. He prefers that I move along, there’s nothing to see here, despite the huge pile of wreckage from his story. It would be so much better for Dan that I just believe that the huge wreck in front of me is not his own fault despite his holding the bent steering with hundreds of witnesses pointing at Dan as the cause. He has a problem with the way his material has been analyzed. He prefers that his story be accepted despite all the obvious questions his material has generated as to the veracity of his claims. There is truth to Dan’s story, his being arrested, sent away on four 5150’s, one contempt of court and that huge pile is not so easily explained away by Dan as it all being “based on lies”.
Then on March 21, 2017 at 11:51 pm he claims he is tired of responding to either of us deceptive creeps. There is deception but it does not come from the outside of Dan’s story, it comes from Dan himself. His deception is not in the details but in the cause. To further illustrate my reasoning, Dan claims that having to respond to Publion and myself has caused us to bring out the worst in Dan. Dan will justify this behavior by claiming that he has a God given right to defend himself against lies and liars. Dan is unable to take responsibility for his own actions by laying the blame for his conduct on Publion and myself. Anyone who has children has dealt with an angry child who blames their poor behavior on the person who has made them mad. We have seen how Dan reacts when he gets mad. All the material needed to see this comes from Dan’s himself and it is available on this website for anyone to read and assess. Dan has all the time in the world to respond to comments made about his material. There is plenty of time to read what has been posted and plenty of time to think about how to respond before hitting the post button. Despite this, we have not seen the best of Dan or we have seen Dan as he truly is.
The apostate cult and publiar must be really proud of you, Jimmy, they have groomed a Mini-pee liar, that's just as bad or possibly worse than the rest of the fakes and frauds of your cult. You can try to deceive and blame all this on myself, when you should see by your own example, that your cult is possibly plagued with as many liars, as pedophiles and perverts. After all, you realize it took millions of lies to cover up and make excuses for the disgusting issues of the creeps in your cult. After a while you even have to start making up lies to cover for your lies. The train left the station centuries ago and headed for it's destination, and it's not going to be a pretty one.
I would have no problem with my story being analyzed or assessed, but when blatant liars think they can imagine, guess or expound, think plausible or most probable, to previous lies and stupid untrue theories, then we have a problem, and it surely isn't mine. The snowball of lies has reached close to maximum, and the Almighty is waiting to see how it will hold up in His fire and brimstone. The "lies" are the "huge pile", and you creeps are going to be the ones who will be doing all the explaining. You better hope it's not in front of God, because he has the truth, as sure as you liars show your ignorance, nonsense and stupidity.
If I had done anything close to what I was falsely accused of, I would have no problem taking blame. I know what is the truth, and I have total faith in my Creator that I will receive justice from you lyin' creeps fairly soon. He's never let me down yet, and when you see that justice fall upon you, remember just why it happened. You deceivers will never be able to get me out of your head, and you'll forever remember the warnings from the Lord's Word, against all the liars and perverts of your cult. servant of a just and vengeful God
And the sham continues: SNAP and their issues are no longer the topic but Dan and his faith are the topic. How surprising not.
Can't agree with you more, Jim. How about checking out some of my faith. God has an open door and is willing to listen. He won't turn His back on you or stab you in the back, like we witness with the frauds of this so-called, one true church. There's a place of forgiveness and peace, that these sickos can only imagine, and yet can't come close to knowing how God can give a peace, in the midst of your enemies, even wicked, deceiving ones. Your choice. God's peace and understanding, or a catholic, living hell. Of course, I know you prefer atheism, but I fail to see any benefit to that, other than not belonging to any false religions.
Have you catholics ever given thought to the fact that your church boasts mostly of visions of mary. Did it ever cross your mind that the Creator, God of Miracles, just may be sending followers false visions of the goddess you happen to worship. I almost never hear any news or boasting of a vision of Christ. EWTN, the catholic TV and radio station is always talking and bringing glory to the ever-virgin mary, claimed "Queen of Heaven*", constantly. Lying creeps in this forum want to make you believe that I hate all catholics, and there is nothing further from the truth. I'm not interested in seeing anyone go to hell, and I wouldn't be investing all this time if that was so. I have absolutely nothing to gain, in telling others to read the Bible and find the truth. It will lead you on an amazing journey with the God who loves you like no other, and gets no thrill from seeing His people lost and deceived by hypocrisy and liars. Don't let the wicked followers of Satan fool you, for that is his and their ultimate goal. They failed and their only interest is bringing the lost down with them.
*Jeremiah 44, Explains God's disgust with those who worshipped the "Queen of Heaven". They burned incense and made cakes in the form of the moon (Communion host). Their monstrance houses the sun, held in place by a crescent moon. Pagan worship of sun and moon and everything that is in opposition to God, Our Creator. Read it before saying I'm wrong.
"Do not allow yourselves to be condemned by anyone who claims to be superior because of special visions and who insist on false humility and the worship of angels. For no reason at all, such people are all puffed up by their human way of thinking." Col 2:18 (GNB)
"Don't be cheated by people who make a show of acting humble and who worship angels. They brag about seeing visions. But it is all nonsense, because their minds are filled with selfish desires." Col 2:18 (CEV)
On March 25, 2017 at 1:08 pm Dan claims he would have no problem with his story being analyzed or assessed. His material has been analyzed and assessed but the conclusion based off his material do not lead to where Dan prefers they lead. When Dan doesn’t like the conclusions made based off of the information he has provided he will add you to the list of the hundreds of lying creeps who he believes are out to get him. He further claims he would have no problem taking blame for what he has been accused of but this certainly is not accurate. Dan refuses to take responsibility for his actions and his testimony all over this website attests to that.
This is all I have to say, to all the lying hypocrites of your apostate cult -
"You are of your father the devil, and you want to do the desires of your father. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. Whenever he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own nature, for he is a liar, and the father of all lies." John 8:44 catechism of the catholic church in a nutshell
Father of all cowards, greedy, unbelieving, hypocrites, sexually immoral, idolators and above all liars, and those who love the lie. There's shall be the Lake of Fire. servant of Justice
"Theirs[sic] shall be the Lake of Fire.", for Mr. Know-It-All.
I’ll go down the list in the order that the comments appear on the site, although not all of them need be discussed.
On the 24th at 1204AM ‘Dan’ tries to have a go at the problem of – as he nicely puts it – his “lying accusations”: all of the conclusions drawn about him are “probable” , while all of his accusations against the Church and priests and so on are not taken for “true” but rather are “analyzed and questioned”.
Once again he tries to personalize the conceptual – the better to distract from the conceptual problems with his material.
I have pointed out consistently and constantly why the problems with his material make his assertions and claims improbable (if not also impossible) while the revelations about his own position are – by the material he himself has submitted – quite probable.
Your sly usage of terms, "probable" and "plausible" and "possible" in no way mean the truth. Anymore than my accosting, haranguing and harrassing, and your repeating these accusations make them come true. Yours and all your Minis, dreamed up scenarios and fantasies in this forum, does not in anyway change the beautiful message the Lord had for the children. And being they were catholic kids, that's further proof that I have no hate for any decent catholics. Would like to see adult catholics leave the apostate cult, but that would have to be their decision. On the other hand, I can't say that I have some great love, for those who have insistently accused myself and others, with lies, slander and nasty insinuations, especially when they also are the biggest, lying defenders and excusers for the pedophiles and perverts of the cult. Anything I've quoted from the Word or any harsh things I've said, are meant to bring change or repentance from those heading down the wrong path. Obviously, from what we've seen from the repetitive, lying creeps of your cult, those probabilities, plausibilities or possibilities of change, range from slim to none. servant of a God, offering forgiveness for the truly repentant
Continuing with my comment on ‘Dan’s of the 24th at 1204AM:
‘Dan’s first presumption – of course – is that all of his accusations are “true”. He cawnt’ see how anyone can doubt or question that. And his even more fundamental presumption is that he is as sane and normal and truthful as anybody and is also acting under the authority and speshull guidance of God.
That’s what a nice, tight FDS will get you.
And he manipulatively creates a straw-man position that is not mine, i.e. that analysis and questioning of his myriad accusations must inevitably “come to the wrong conclusion that [his accusations] must be false”. As I have said, each case or claim must be examined on its own, in light of the deranging effect of the Stampede.
On then to ‘Dan’s of the 24th at 144AM:
Here we must presume that ‘Dan’ was “perfectly describing” Catholicism, and that’s a presumption that I don’t gratuitously make.
He will then – of course – try to bolster his bit here with a pericope, this time the second chapter of the Second Letter of Peter. But, once again, the presumption here remains: that what the Letter is talking about and what ‘Dan’ is talking about are the same thing.
But it is surely equally possible (if not also probable) that the “false teachers” reference could apply – not to put too fine a point on it – to ‘Dan’.
As always, in order to read the text and come to ‘Dan’s conclusions (and his ‘truth’) one would first have to accept ‘Dan’s presumptions.
On then to ‘Dan’s of the 23rd at 1105PM:
Again, nothing but the same old claim that the points indicating the high probability of his inaccuracy (and mendacity) are merely “repetitive lies against [him”.
Then some childish word-play: he has taken my abbreviation of Fixed Delusional System, FDS, and come up with his own epithetical, I’m Not/You Are game.
And he has noticed that I have been referring to the “I’m Not/You Are” bit quite a lot lately. That would be because ‘Dan’ has been retreating to that juvenile ‘comeback’ gambit quite a lot lately. Which is hardly surprising, given the weakness of his material and the hugely damaging revelations he unwittingly provides every time he tries to further spin his web.
On then to ‘Dan’s of the 26th at 108AM:
Here ‘Dan’ doth piously bleat that he “would have no problem with [his] story being analyzed or assessed, but …” – doncha see? – when the analysis and assessment yield information and material that doesn’t support the cartoons constituting ‘Dan’s FDS, then it’s all just “blatant” lies and so on and so forth.
And the epithetical riff chugs on from there.
Has “the snowball” gone and “reached close to maximum”? I would say that we have gotten pretty close to the core of the ‘Dan’ issue here, but we’re dealing with an FDS so it won’t be stopping any time soon.
Continuing with my comment on ‘Dan’s of the 26th at 108AM:
And then another pious bleat: he would “have no problem taking blame” if he indeed “had done anything close to what [he] was falsely accused of” but – doncha see? – he didn’t do any such things so he needn’t be taking any blame whatsoever at all. Bottom line: ‘Dan’s doesn’t lie, everybody else involved does.
And then – from the ridiculous to the sublime – ‘Dan’ doth allow as how “You deceivers will never be able to get me out of your head”. I don’t speak for the readership, but I can assure him that I will be able to do so; he’s just another – if somewhat florid – example of a textbook case.